traffic stats
Dec 202013

Social-Media in family courtCan SMS Text Messages be used as Evidence in the Family Court? The short answer to this is YES, YES and YES again.

In fact, not only are SMS text messages admissible as evidence in the Family Court (and all other family law jurisdictions), but so are emails, Facebook posts, Twitter tweets, skype transcripts, and YES, even comments on our very own Fathers4Equality Blog, and any other electronic messaging that have become ubiquitous in the time of accessible mass communication.

free trialTry Readnotify now – register online for a free no-obligation trial.

For instance, in a recent hearing at the Federal Circuit Court, Judge Warwick Neville ordered a marshal to investigate Facebook postings made by a father involved in an acrimonious child custody dispute. The unnamed father had reportedly made harsh criticisms of the court system on the social networking site. The man had also revealed confidential information about the case, claimed the magistrate and expert witnesses had been duped by the mother and even alleged that the mother abused their children. [citation]

In another case, a mother in the middle of a custody dispute hds been caught boasting on her Facebook page how she thought about ripping her husband off for another $20,000. “Felt like being a smart arse,” she wrote, signing off “Bwahahaha lol.”  Lawyers are now advising their clients locked in Family Court fights to take down their Facebook pages as the networking site has become both the latest weapon and target for warring spouses. [citation]

Did you know that Fathers4Equality are on Twitter? Yes indeed, and we have over 1,300 followers. So why not join the two-way instant communication revolution.

But this ominous warning is one that is simply not being heard by many parents, with emails and SMS text messages now being the single most relied upon form of evidence submitted in family law proceedings in Australia, even carrying significantly more weight because they are often not disputed.

outlook_readnotify trackingHowever, apart from the obvious, electronic messages can play a vital role in your family law circumstances, even if you are not planning on going to Court. Many disputes hinge on whether one parent or the other has received (or read) a particular email, which can be very hard to prove sometimes.

I recently attended a hearing in Court in assistance of one of the members of Fathers4Equality. In this case there was an interesting dispute over evidence, being an alleged email.

The father  insisted that he sent an email to the mother on the day that the child was to be returned to her, advising her that the child was ill and that she may be returned late. The child was ultimately returned back to the mother late.

As the parents had a poor relationship, email correspondence was the standard way that they would communicate, so the fact that the father had alleged that he sent an email advising the mother of this event was not out of the ordinary.

The mother however claimed that there was no email. She alleged that this was all part of a pattern by the father of late deliveries, and that the ‘email’ story was a concoction made up as an excuse for Court.

Now this issue, as it so happens, was not further investigated by the Court, but had it been, it could have ended up being a key deciding issue leading to the credibility of both of the parties.

OutlookExpressSampleHad proper measures been taken by the father, for instance, he could have, assuming he was telling the truth, proven that not only did he send the email, but that his ex-wife actually read the email. He could also have also shown what time she read the email, for how long she read it, from what location and internet account, and even from which computer.

As it should be clear in this instance, with a little preparation, the ex-wife could have been conclusively shown to have ‘lied’ or mis-represented the facts in Court on this matter, had she in fact been untruthful.

I raise this story because time and time again I have cautioned separating parents to think carefully about the emails they send during the ‘difficult’ early periods of separation.

I also urge separated parents who correspond primarily via email to safeguard their correspondence by either BCCing a trusted friend, by using a standard Return Receipt facility if available in your email client, or ideally by using a professional email forensics service such as ReadNotify, which not only provides Court admissable proof that an email has been sent, but also when it has been read by the other party. (and provides extra services like self-destructing messages after having been opened once, which makes it difficult to copy or print the email contents.

For a free trial of ReadNotify , simply register via teh below website, or download the email client add-ons, as listed below/

The free trial lasts for two weeks or 25 emails (whichever comes first). 

Try Readnotify now – register online for a free no-obligation trial.

or Download the email client add-ons: Windows (All versions inc Vista and Win7) | v4.0 for Windows XP | Mac OSX

These add-ons work with your existing email client on your computer. When you send an email, you will see a new button that will give you the option to track it if you wish. After you sent the first tracked email, the system will register you for the Free Trial.

What Does ReadNotify Do?

  • ReadNotify provides email tracking and proof of sending as well as reading.
  • Readnotify records when, where and how long an email was read.
  • Location, ISP and computer settings are also recorded, as well as which attachents or links are opened/clicked
  • ReadNotify can also send messages that self-destruct after having been opened once.
  • ReadNotify can make it difficult for the email recipient to copy or print the message contents.
  • A Windows tool plugs into many programs and catches all outgoing mail seamlessly.
  • ReadNotify integrates with Hotmail and Yahoo! Mail in Internet Explorer.
  • You can also send a tracked email simply by adding “” to the recipient’s address.
  • You decide whether tracking is transparent to the recipient or “invisible”.
  • “Ensured-receipt” messages are kept at ReadNotify servers and thus tracked under all circumstances.
  • ReadNotify uses PGP signatures including time-stamps to prove sending and opening of emails.
  • In addition to the recipient’s location, ReadNotify can track forwarded emails and attachments.


  3 Responses to “Can your SMS Text Messages be used as Evidence in the Family Court?”

  1. Are voice mail messages sent to my phone able to be used as evidence in family court?

  2. […] Answer = YES (in Australia, anyway): Can your SMS Text Messages be used as Evidence in the Family Court? […]

  3. Free speech in Australia is non existent, we do have implied freedom of political communication’ that is to speak freely of anything pertaining to our governance, the running of the government, particularly including judges and courts, that is essential to liberty from tyranny, in reality we the people are the government, what has become know as ‘the government’ are our employee’s.

    Thing is we are being controlled, manipulated and ruled by sociopaths and psychopaths, I have tried and test these a number of judges, when it comes down to it they lie and cheat to get the out come they want, is why feminists lawyer and women do, one thing for sure there not interested in truth or justice or honor.

    How do you think royal families get to the top of the food chain, a hold on so much land and wealth?

    “Due to their brains and skill at manipulating people, they usually have college degrees and often hold down good jobs. They frequently have spouses and kids — with nobody suspecting a thing. And, as mentioned, crimes by psychopaths are well-planned, making capture difficult.”

    “The basic assumption that the truth lies between the testimony of the two sides always shifts the advantage to the lying side and away from the side telling the truth. Under most circumstances, this shift put together with the fact that the truth is going to also be twisted in such a way as to bring detriment to the innocent person, results in the advantage always resting in the hands of liars – psychopaths. Even the simple act of giving testimony under oath is useless. If a person is a liar, swearing an oath means nothing to that person. However, swearing an oath acts strongly on a serious, truthful witness. Again, the advantage is placed on the side of the liar. [Robert Canup] ”

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.