Date: November 2005
Dear [Name]
Please consider answering the following question which would lead our group (Fathers4Equality) to a better understanding of your views on this very important issue.
You may choose to answer with one of the following five choices, in response to the below comment:
"Should an amendment be submitted to the family law act to incorporate a 'legal presumption of equal parenting time in the event of separation, ***rebuttable*** if child abuse can be reasonably substantiated, or if the parents mutually agree to an alternate arrangement.', then if it went to a conscience vote, I would vote for the amendment."
(A) I agree
(B) I disagree
(C) I withhold my view
(D) I am undecided
Please understand that this is not (as commonly mis-represented) a one size fits all approach. This is merely a starting point for child custody negotiations that would begin on a level playing field but the outcome would be determined by either the rebuttal, or the practical realities of the parents' circumstances. It would deny a winner takes all mentality, and re-focus efforts on arrangements that best meet the child's best needs.
If you are honestly uncertain, then you can choose option (E) for a more detailed view of our proposed joint residence amendment.